Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Sand Car Builders Oregon



Obama is going the hard time with his proposed health care reform in the U.S.. Insurance and tobacco go for it,


and unless you do is call "socialist" and take pictures with the mustache of Aznar.

Fortunately here is thanks to Franco and his successors, health cover for free and universal, under the general budget, now more or less discovered in the regions.

But is that coverage of good quality?

If you go to the health center, is jam packed, if you go to the nearest hospital emergency room, or more distant, find long queues and hours of delay, crowded into the waiting room, next to of grandparents dying, you can play to watch the military priest gives the oils from the neighboring table,

and everything to get you to attend a first-time resident, or medical staff exhausted and solvency unknown.

Touching enter, the rooms are crowded, there are five rooms in three patients, and the beds in the hallways, as prisons go.
.
How can you beat that? You can increase the health budget, but where does it detracts, because the money is not expandable? What education? What justice? What promotion? What equality? Anything would be unfair to the relevant area, their ministers and ministers and their officials and officers. And do not say if it would save by closing the autonomies.
.
health spending in many actors have a responsibility, as seen in the graph, and some people propose to require the city to tighten the belt, to be least doctor and spend less on medicine.


Some proponents of "co", which is paid at least part of what we consume, pushing the fiction of "total free", which encourages both free riders.


This already exists in the drug, of which the city pays 40% except retirees. Some have proposed, perhaps starting with the copayment Catalunya also in health care, as indeed in other countries, or at least a down payment, which is then refunded.



These measures are unpopular, but discourage excessive consumption. They are just in the sense that he pays more use most, but the problem is that they can be deterred most needy, especially in times of crisis.

Do you have any opinion?

0 comments:

Post a Comment