journalists and politicians, in their ridiculous attempt at mimicry, speak in these days of "pre-conditions" and pretending to imitate the technical language.
However, when a doctor asks a patient does not ask for "pre-conditions" - "disease" is not synonymous with sickness, but by previous illness or at least simple and simply asks "What have you?"
.
Having other diseases can always influence the evolution and complications of any nueva enfermedad que se contraiga, pero tampoco hay que abusar.
En el caso de la gripe H1N1 está claro que la existencia de “patologías previas” condiciona el curso de la enfermedad hasta justificar la muerte por ella: “Decimonovena muerte por la nueva gripe –oímos-. Se trata de una mujer de 55 años con “patologías previas”.
Luego en la letra pequeña se dice que esa “patología previa” consistía en estar gorda, o en ser bajito, o en tomarse tres cafés al día.
Por el momento las “patologías previous "death warrant for the new flu, I do not know if that reassures the population, but if they do not understand, because who does not have" previous conditions ", just be that of being born, and born here in Spain, in either?
Luego en la letra pequeña se dice que esa “patología previa” consistía en estar gorda, o en ser bajito, o en tomarse tres cafés al día.
Por el momento las “patologías previous "death warrant for the new flu, I do not know if that reassures the population, but if they do not understand, because who does not have" previous conditions ", just be that of being born, and born here in Spain, in either?
is possible that the "previous conditions" make fortunes, and go to always be a mitigating factor or defense of a bad outcome,
0 comments:
Post a Comment