few years ago, when he was starting to use thrombolytic therapy in stroke, I was in Philadelphia, USA. In shelters bus stops displaying an advertisement for a law firm that said: "If you or a loved one has arrived at a hospital with a stroke and have not applied the thrombolytic therapy, please contact us. If you or a family member has come to a hospital with a stroke, we have applied the thrombolytic therapy and has not gone well, please contact us. " 
There is no escape. If you do, screwed, and if you do it goes wrong, they also screwed. 
Fortunately in our country the public is not always blame the messenger or intermediary, "but that attitude is increasing, "and our lawyers, although they are not as aggressive.
Fortunately some judges and courts also understand the vast difference between an error and negligence.
While the error is inherent in all human activity and therefore not punishable, neglect, and inadequate preparation, improper action or by omission, yes. Depending on its features may even be considered criminal negligence.
The criminal courts is faster to meet demand, but it is very difficult to prove that a physician acted in bad faith. The civil courts can get better compensation, but in our country seems to be eternal.
doctors are accused of unionism face when alleged negligence, but in general what happens is that you better understand the errors of colleagues, because it gets you.
Going to the doctor, or use the services of Health is the most dangerous things you can do, but the excessive prosecution of medicine always turns against the patient.
The doctor tries to "heal in health" by testing or by taking measures that may be unnecessary,
.jpg)
and that increases the risk of complications, and public systems more expensive and slows the proceedings.
Away from me, however, deter anyone from claiming what is theirs, or considerations.
While the error is inherent in all human activity and therefore not punishable, neglect, and inadequate preparation, improper action or by omission, yes. Depending on its features may even be considered criminal negligence. 
The criminal courts is faster to meet demand, but it is very difficult to prove that a physician acted in bad faith. The civil courts can get better compensation, but in our country seems to be eternal.
doctors are accused of unionism face when alleged negligence, but in general what happens is that you better understand the errors of colleagues, because it gets you. 
Going to the doctor, or use the services of Health is the most dangerous things you can do, but the excessive prosecution of medicine always turns against the patient. 
The doctor tries to "heal in health" by testing or by taking measures that may be unnecessary, .jpg)
and that increases the risk of complications, and public systems more expensive and slows the proceedings. 
Away from me, however, deter anyone from claiming what is theirs, or considerations. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment