Why environmentalists are the environmentalists? Might be a simple yes or why and why not? or what not? meaning that can not be otherwise. But we must make the effort to answer this question apparently so simple if we know what it means to be green, how to produce the drift of a lifestyle commensurate with the society in which we live to a desire, an attempt or effort to change the world.
addition to a large group of people who almost since birth have felt a deep fascination with the natural world leads them to want to know, enjoy it and keep it I believe there must be other motivations that are important. For example, there are many people who have been captivated by the speech, image, or the doing of others and in Spain the most relevant figure is still Félix Rodríguez de la Fuente.
In an increasingly large group would include people who have come out of conviction after an examination of certain realities, disciplines or subjects. It would be a form of intellectual background, academic or professional. Thus, a citizen who had not previously had a special provision to the love or the preservation of nature after learning processes and data seems logical to raise awareness. The phrase, after two thousand years, better still reflects this phenomenon is that of Catullus's "Knowing everything is love everything" (as they often quote from memory the author and the sentence). For example, does not value the Industrial and Mining Heritage, perhaps even despised-up is not known. Obviously there are degrees and not all people are in the same stadium.
Following the saying "think wrong and be right "I think there are too self-interested environmentalists, for convenience or necessity.'s not the same be against destroying dams that can destroy or change the life of the rivers must be, because it to flood your people, your home, your church, cemetery, school, your place ... Within this modality should be clearly distinguished from that need, emergency or direct involvement of interest or convenience, more nuanced and less negative understandable and forgivable. The case of some national political, regional, provincial or municipal governments is clear.
Without excluding other categories I think there is a considerable group People who openly declared military or environmentalists with a sense of guilt at or near certain remedies. Without being the case, but for its graphic value a person of widths, Ciudad Real for which he had special admiration, Uncle Paul, said it stopped being hunter once shot a venao and saw the animal cried ... Well, there are many "well, let's leave it at" some "because in Spain there is more than the football crowd and a little over-osseous some people who have felt guilty or responsible for certain personal or family activities. On the one hand, some have wanted to "atone" for their potential guilt. Furthermore, algotros, they say in Los Montes, have wanted to spy on the new movement, in time, intervene, interfere, manipulate, imposing silence, mislead, divert and, somehow, to prevent the talk, criticize or pursue its own sake. This, it might seem a mere vagary, has much more substance than it might seem. There have been spies and environmentalists are strictly a word in the service of big power, not so great and the political parties.
On one occasion, an ecologist from a small town made me a very critical analysis of all members of the environmental group the next village. At first it seemed a simple attack, but the funny thing is that made sense and to a certain likelihood. Then over time I've seen pros and cons to this interpretation but it certainly has some interesting pros. In addition I have met more people, I have delved into some issues including concerns me most, my self and I think it is so easy to answer honestly the question of why we are ecologists and environmentalists.
0 comments:
Post a Comment